[X.com] by @ryancbriggs

We should all be so angry that peer reviewed academic results are something like 4x larger than what people find when they put our work into practice. Why does this happen? In this case, it’s probably ~all due to low power and selection on significance. This is very bad!


Quoted Tweet:

I4R @I4Replication

Why do some interventions fail to scale? 🤔 We chat with @sdellavi & @ElizabethLinos about their paper ‘RCTs to Scale,’ uncovering surprising evidence of publication bias & its implications for open science. Don’t miss this! 🎙️ https://t.co/McUyR0wtW6

View original tweet Thu Dec 12 23:39:12 +0000 2024

View original on X.com